Thursday 25 April 2013

How NOT to Defend Your Reviews, with an Example


This entire blog is dedicated to Kasey Chang aka mlm skeptic so it can also be considered a "what NOT to do" by so called senior MLMers reviewers.  


Dear kasey Chang aka mlm skeptic


Well I suppose this blog was primarily for Oz and You :-). I guess that’s why the one blog. Oooohh sorry I didn't explain that to you and your kroonies. I don’t have time to waste and write nonsense, but I believe my intelligence was attacked and thus the response. So please read carefully the response below from an amateur


Showing people how amateurish I am won’t help you...people read and decide for themselves, this is not a courtroom, its reality. WAKE UP DUDE.


 I’m so happy that the blog its reaching its intended goal  ....You actually wrote a blog about it, you saw my thoughts and they are live to the world. 


Believe it or not the amateur is making seniors of blogging (Kasey Chang) write articles in response to bad arguments?


Well the take home message from Kasey Chang blog is all companies audited by EY will at some point be pyramid scams or will fail..... (gees this is scary). Our brother Kasey Chang has no trust in the Auditors, but in Oz and critical thinking……… based on what? On historical failures?


If my blog was nonsense why did you take time to reply to it????


I’m sure you took 2 weeks to come with such nonsensical ideas?


I gave people 2 choices


To either believe:


1. An anonymous world of people like Kasey chang and Oz, who spend much of their time on internet and lying under disguises of critical thinking, whilst generating traffic to their blogs?.


OR


2. A whole broad of tangible systems and people they can ask? EY, Government, people who they know among others.


Anyway I won’t dwell on that because this is to the reader who believes in systems not anonymous bloggers who give bad arguments with no evidence. Kasey I did not expect any more positive reviews from you than defend Oz and critical thinking?? What is critical thinking anyway? Is it Oz?? tell me more about it?


Anyway some quick responses as my response could not fit in the comments


NB: The numbered items are quoted from mlm skeptic blog and my response is WVH



1)     This author, i.e. WorldVentureHappy picked the Blogger Scheme that is IDENTICAL to my own when there are DOZENS that he could have picked.????

  

WVH:  What are you talking about? Anyone can choose a blog scheme they want???....and this is a senior mlm reviewer who has issues such as this????


2)      Unfortunately, this does NOT prove legitimacy whatsoever. Here's a simple counter-example: Equinox. It appeared on the FRONT COVER of Inc. Magazine in 1996, as No.1 in the Inc 500 companies. Must be legitimate right? Wrong. Four years later it's closed by FTC as a pyramid scheme.


WVH:   This is FTC not EY…do you know the difference????. Companies Associated with EY have gone through a due diligence.

WVH:   Is it the only evidence you have of historical failures.....so you base your arguments on these not your so called critical thinking (This is clear cut confusion)


3)      What does where the critics are and what they do have something to do with their analysis?


WVH:    What world are you living in DUDE……  It has everything to do with trust and confidence in what they have done and can do, It has everything you do with how you view life. At least I know you reply nonsense to all mlm posts so I have confidence on that!


4)      When you encounter information that you doubt, you choose to trust it or not. How you make that decision depends on what supporting evidence you see and your priorities are


WVH:   Good thinking I guess that's why I wrote the blog, to enlighten people on the things you and Oz chose to ignore


5)      However, WorldVentureHappy here, because he does not agree with the information he got (from BehindMLM, about the shadiness of WV), he chose to IGNORE all the analysis and evidence presented by Oz


WVH:     What evidence did he prove….critical thinking??????? I replied to the same Oz who posted in his blog about pyramid scheme and he chose not to post or reply to it, so who chose to ignore who? (Another confused fact in trying to save his friend the critical thinker)

WVH:    what shadiness did he talk about? This was reply to Oz in the comments who happens to be the same person who wrote his posts


6)      This is called confirmation bias: anything that agrees with what we believe is emphasized, and anything that disagrees with what we believe is ignored / ridiculed / bashed. We are all guilty of this at one time or another.


WVH:   I like you’re your honesty and I believe it has filled many of your posts (Typically stabbing himself)


7)      The problem here is being "open minded" means "willingness to change your mind if the evidence demonstrates otherwise".


WVH:   No it doesn’t mean that it means be open minded and see the bigger picture…its simple English (Self conclusion which is bad and foolish to any serious critical thinker)


8)      WVH had not presented any evidence to cause anyone to do so


 WVH:   Quoting The author of this blog “This is called confirmation bias: anything that agrees with what we believe is emphasized, and anything that disagrees with what we believe is ignored / ridiculed / bashed. We are all guilty of this at one time or another.”


WVH:   As the reader of this blog you are there to decide check my blog at http://worldventureshappy.blogspot.com, Be the judge of what you read? (Self conclusion which is bad and foolish to any serious critical thinker)


9)     But what prompted it? It seems to be some "cheerleading" remarks he posted over at BehindMLM (linked above) regarding World Ventures. However, Oz had apparently nuked the comments as spam. (which only upsets him as he considers that "censorship")

  

WVH:   Quoting The author of this blog “This is called confirmation bias: anything that agrees with what we believe is emphasized, and anything that disagrees with what we believe is ignored / ridiculed / bashed. We are all guilty of this at one time or another.”


  

10)   WVH had just presented evidence that he is the exact opposite of open-minded, because he REFUSED to even consider the possibility, that Oz just may be right in his analysis of WV, even partially


WVH:   Maybe right, but its wrong….Ooopps


11)  It wasn't even the same topic he posted prior, and then he accused me of saying "Every MLM is a pyramid scheme", when the topic of the post is the DIFFERENCES between MLM and pyramid scheme.


WVH:   Quoting the author of this blog “My conclusion was that MLM and Travel doesn't go together. If you don't agree, give me some evidence on why you think I'm wrong. Telling me to "get a life" only proves that your feelings are hurt, nothing else. And if your feelings are hurt so easily, you should not be in sales.”


12)  But instead, he had to dig up some bull**** and irrelevant reasons to cast doubt on Oz's analysis.


WVH:   Quoting The author of this blog “This is called confirmation bias: anything that agrees with what we believe is emphasized, and anything that disagrees with what we believe is ignored / ridiculed / bashed. We are all guilty of this at one time or another.”

WVH:   As the reader of this blog you are there to decide check my blog at http://worldventureshappy.blogspot.com, Be the judge of what you read?



13)  Is this guy f***ing BLIND?!?!?! It's certainly not looking good for his intelligence.


WVH:    I thought I was an amateur who relies on FACTS……or are you talking about critical thinking????????

WVH:   To any serious reviewers offending language turns away serious readers so avoid this


14)  There is only one post, EVER, on this blog, started in March, and no update EVER.


WVH:   http://worldventureshappy.blogspot.com To anyone reading this thread check it out and let’s hear your thoughts. Who said I should create more than one???. I reached my intended audience and they saw the bigger picture????

WVH:   Im glad you check my post everyday, sadly your browser takes you to the cached website


 15)  When you find the information or an opinion you do not agree with, you should examine the evidence presented and combat evidence with contradicting evidence. Then examine the other opinion and make sure the evidence actually support the opinion and if there are alternative explanations that the evidence can also support


WVH:   Exactly what I did!!!!!  I’m so happy we agree at least on something



16)  This is like high school debate 101. It's surprising how few people have any idea how to debate.


WVH:    Well I suppose this blog was primarily for Oz and You :-). I guess that’s why the one blog. You don’t need to be good at debate to present something, YOU SIMPLY STATE THE FACTS!!!!



Well mlm skeptic after reading your blog carefully I don’t think you had to spend sleepless nights in trying to write a nonsensical blog to an amateur.

On a serious note , your reviews are useless and we know your are just generating trafficking to your website, that explains the adverts on your site. So stop wasting peoples time and yours!


Conclusion


To the so called senior reviewers of mlm don’t make a mistake of trying to hide on critical thinking and claiming every fact is nonsense in fact being critical to sound evidence only helps the readers clearly see that their reviews are garbage and trash and they deserve to be in the bin. The readers who are unbiased should have the call. What he has made clear to me and most of the world is there’s nothing to offers on his blog. He only has time to show the world he can respond badly to anyone who says negative statements about his blog!!. To anyone who read his article article, this is an example of a bad reviewer who has no evidence but trust in Oz and what he calls critical thinking…based on what, flying ducks and use of offending language. He has precious time to waste, and check most of his blogs; they have few or no comments!!!


GET A LIFE Kasey Chang


CHEERS AND TAKE CARE